Aristotle and Weed Essay

What would Aristotle deliberate about court-orderedizing Marijuana? When attempting to speculate on how Aristotle would feel about this inquiry, I feel that entirely one thing must be addressed. What pleasant of person does cannabis make me, and does the legalization of cannabis increase or decrease a persons ability to be quick and beloved? What Kind of Person According to Aristotle, the difference between animals and man is our ability to rationalize and put on suit. Man is at its most raw material level rational animals.Non-rational beings only possess vegetative and appetitive aspects of their mind, whereas serviceman retain the most important, according to Aristotle, portion of the soul the rational part. The reason that this is the most important is that it allows us to ascertain genuine bliss. Therefore, since animals and even children do not possess the rational facet of the soul, they cannot achieve true blessedness. As humans, our advantage over non-rational beings is our ability to be happy, as defined by Aristotle. Happiness, he states, is apparently something complete and self-sufficient, since it is the end of the things achievable in action. (NE 1097b20). So for Aristotle to approve of the legalization of it, marihuana would have to be something that would advance the happiness of humans and move on reason on the part of the soul. So does marijuana foster sensible choices and assist humans in our quest for happiness? Well, when analyzed from a philosophical viewpoint, no. Using drugs diminishes our ability to utilize reason when faced with decisions. It modifies our mindset and transforms us from rational animals into just playing area simple animals.Drugs can force one to talk with slurred speech, visibly alter their perceptions of what is going on around them, and even take their freedom of will. So the fact that marijuana decreases human ability to be rational, reasonable, and thusly happy, I would have to say that Aristotle would disapprove for most cases. However, medicinal marijuana does promote happiness. If someone has a disease in which the use of marijuana could numb his or her pain, I remember that Aristotle would say that this is ok and good because it is assisting him or her in his or her quest for happiness, even if temporary.So where would he draw the line between vice and virtue? I think that Aristotle would support the system that we have today. Excess would be allowing everyone to purchase marijuana. pretermit would be outlawning it completely because it does have some benefits for the medical community. I think that the Mean would be allowing it to be used for medicinal purposes only and not for public access because repeated use does not promote rationalization and happiness. In conclusion, I think that Aristotle would not support the encourage legalization of marijuana for personal use.Aristotle would, however, not take action to ban it any further either. I think that he would be satisfy with how the system is today. Marijuana does have some medicinal benefits to people with untellable diseases in that it creates, although fleeting, happiness. For normal people, however, repeated use of marijuana results in a deteriorated capacity to make rational decisions. It weakens our soul and forces us to become senseless animals. This fact forces me to conclude that Aristotle would neither further nor reduce the current legal status of marijuana.